However, critics note that car title loans represent some of the worst examples of predatory lending out there. The Star-Telegram reported that in 2013, the most recent data available at the time, Texas consumers forked over $360 million in interest and fees to vehicle title loan companies. That figure was up $53 million from a year earlier, in 2012.
Mary Dixon, a resident of Mansfield in the state of Texas, represents of good example of the heartbreak and financial hardship that lay at the end of a car title loan. As reported in February 2015, Dixon suddenly found herself in need of some quick cash to cover an unexpected family emergency.
A vehicle title loan proved attractive, in that Dixon had collateral in her 2007 Mercury Mountaineer, with the car title loan company asking few questions, if any, with regard to outstanding bills, other debts, her credit score, her income, or other aspects of her financial health that would be a common query from a bank or other financial institution.
She borrowed nearly $3,000 against the equity she had in her car: $2,994.95, to be exact. A month later she had paid a prepaid finance charge of more than $300. In order to keep her car, she faced a final balloon payment of $3,351.28. If she didn’t pay, her car would be gone.
A similar situation was faced by the plaintiff in a vehicle title loan lawsuit in New Jersey. Marjorie Moore had sued Capitol Title Loans and owner David Fischer in a class action lawsuit.
Moore’s story is compelling. The plaintiff’s car title loan with Capitol Title Loans was for a face amount of $3,000.00. The effective interest rate was shown as 180.43 percent, a figure industry observers regard as a classic example of predatory lending. The contract required that Moore would have to repay $3,542.50 by the 29 day, which would fall in January, 2014 (the loan was arranged in December, 2013). An $85 fee was added for the lender to take out a lien on Moore’s 2007 Toyota Camry with the New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission, as the loan was secured against the vehicle as collateral.
As it happened, Moore defaulted after two payments. According to court documents the vehicle was seized in January of the following year, in 2015. Should Moore have wished to reclaim her vehicle prior to the vehicle being sold to cover outstanding debts, her bill would be $8,733.25 to clear what was originally a $3,000 loan. What’s more, the amount would increase by $25 for each day the vehicle was in storage.
The charges broke down as follows: $3,085 for the principal balance due, plus interest totaling $5,048.25, repossession fees in the amount of $575 and a daily storage fee of $25.
READ MORE CAR TITLE LOAN LEGAL NEWS
Her lawsuit was originally dismissed by a judge with the Somerset County Superior Court, ruling that Moore’s complaint didn’t fit within the jurisdictional limits of small claims court because it was a class action based on alleged violations of New Jersey statutes.
Moore appealed. The New Jersey Appellate Division, on February 13 of this year, revived the vehicle title loan lawsuit.
The case is Marjorie Moore, on Behalf of Herself and Others Similarly Situated, v. David Fischer d/b/a Capitol Title Loans, Case No. A-3419-15T3, in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
In Texas, Dixon found a way to repay the loan in full, including predatory lending interest.