Request Legal Help Now - Free

Advertisement
LAWSUITS NEWS & LEGAL INFORMATION

Ascertainment Bias an Issue in SSRI Birth Defect Debate

. By
Toronto, ONRecent studies have linked paroxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) frequently prescribed to women for depression and anxiety, to birth defects like PPHN (primary pulmonary hypertension of the newborn). Patients have filed lawsuits against the manufacturers of the antidepressant for failing disclose the potential risks of SSRI use by pregnant women.

The debate over SSRI use by expectant mothers continues to reverberate in the medical community. On the one hand, SSRIs have been known to cause birth defects; on the other hand, untreated depression can cause harm to both mother and baby. Which is the lesser of the two evils?

In a column published on 2/1/10 in Family Practice News, Dr. Gideon Koren acknowledges that SSRI use may pose a risk to the fetus, "there is consensus on one point: if there is a risk, it is very small."

Dr. Koren, a professor of pediatrics, pharmacy, pharmacology, medicine and medical genetics at the University of Toronto and head of the Research Leadership in Better Pharmacotherapy During Pregnancy and Lactation at Toronto's Hospital for Sick Children, notes that studies found Paxil (paroxetine) to be safe during pregnancy for at least a decade following approval in the US in 1992.

That all changed in 2005 when registry data emerged "that appeared to suggest an association between prenatal exposure to paroxetine and a higher-than-expected rate of congenital cardiac malformations," writes Dr. Koren.

Subsequent studies, mostly based on results from administrative databases, produced contradictory results. "Some studies found an association between paroxetine exposure and an increased risk of cardiac malformations, in particular ventricular septal defects (VSD)," says Dr. Koren. "But others did not find this association, and in fact suggested an increased risk for cardiac malformations with other SSRIs, such as sertraline or citalopram. There have also been several meta-analyses, again with mixed results."

For Dr. Koren, the most convincing evidence that an SSRI such as paroxetine does not increase the risk of cardiovascular malformation stems from an international study of infants exposed to paroxetine in the first trimester. According to the study (Am. J. Psychiatry 2008;165:749–52), cardiovascular malformation rate among 1,174 infants exposed to paroxetine in utero when compared with an unexposed group was the same: 0.7 percent v. 1 percent for the general population.

Koren notes that he and his associates performed a meta-analysis of literature between 1985 and 2006, which revealed that first-trimester use of paroxetine was associated with a slight increase in the cardiac malformation birth defect. However, "the use of ultrasound during pregnancy…was 30 percent higher among the women who were on antidepressants during pregnancy, and the babies of women who were on SSRIs had about twice as many echocardiograms during their first year of life than the babies of women who were not on an SSRI during pregnancy. In addition, about four times as many women on paroxetine were using it to treat anxiety than were women on other SSRIs."

The study concludes: "Until we settle this issue of ascertainment bias in this situation, we cannot be certain that in utero exposure to paroxetine is associated with an increased risk of cardiac malformations."

Dr. Koren is director of the Motherisk Program at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto and holds the Ivey Chair in Molecular Toxicology at the Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London.

On October 15 of last year, a Philadelphia jury awarded $2.5 million to the family of Lyam Kilker, who was born with serious heart defects. Lyam's mother was prescribed paroxetine while she was pregnant.

READ ABOUT SSRI LAWSUITS

SSRI Legal Help

If you have suffered losses in this case, please send your complaint to a lawyer who will review your possible [SSRI Lawsuit] at no cost or obligation.

READER COMMENTS

Posted by

on
My daughter was born January 25 2005 with transposition of main arteries. She died 2 times and was revived before having corrective heart surgery immediately after birth. My husband and I did genetic testing which was ruled out as the cause. In stead I was told it was a 1% fluke. I now know it was caused due to me taking paroxetine (manufactured by Apotex) during my pregnancy with her . I found this out sometime later when doing a google search and finding the research confirming and winning lawsuits. My daughter is now 16. She suffers permanent disabilities as a result of this birth defect and corrective surgery. She has sensory processing disorder, developmental delay as well as chronic pain and chronic fatique. We have paid a lot of money toward out of pocket medical expenses. Besides her constant pain and suffering her quality of life is negatively impacted. She has to be home-schooled as she can not fully function for the whole day. This will also remain a problem for her through out her life. Although she is very smart, mature ambitious resilient with awesome potential these disabilities will effect her ability to reach those potentials. She worries about her future as do we as her parents. I am hoping to get justice for her and compensation that will cover her medical costs and pain and suffering. She is also willing to represent herself at age 18.
Please advise as we are willing to do whatever it takes to pursue this lawsuit for a successful outcome for our daughter.

ADD YOUR COMMENT ON THIS STORY

Please read our comment guidelines before posting.


Note: Your name will be published with your comment.


Your email will only be used if a response is needed.

Are you the defendant or a subject matter expert on this topic with an opposing viewpoint? We'd love to hear your comments here as well, or if you'd like to contact us for an interview please submit your details here.


Click to learn more about LawyersandSettlements.com

Request Legal Help Now! - Free