Johnsonvs Walgreens Corporation

[johnson]

Bruce Johnson and Mark Mills gave a statement from their homes in Houston, Texas, “We will not stop pursuing this case against the Defendants, Walgreens Corporation and Does-I-10, Inclusive.”

Johnson and Mills, both, Pro Se plaintiffs filed a Motion for New Trial on July 16th, 2008 in the Second Judicial District Court, in The State of Nevada, in and for The County of Washoe where this case originated in 2003.

On August 6, 2008 and pursuant to the Court’s docket, the matter of Johnson, et al. v. Walgreens, et al. has been re-opened.

Both, Johnson and Mills await the pending decision by The Honorable Judge Janet Berry.

“We recognize Judge Janet Berry has an insurmountable amount of legal documentation to decipher through pursuant to the alarming information provided in our Motion for New Trial and apply the law before she renders a decision.”

“We have been very patient for a long time.” “We are not lawyers.” “We are Pro Se Plaintiffs.” “It took us quite some time to confirm the information before we were able to include what has been disclosed thus far in our Motion for New Trial.”

“We respect The Honorable Judge Janet Berry and understand she is going to need some time before she renders a decision.”

“What we have discovered and included in our Motion for New Trial and is very disconcerting that not only have we been irreparably harmed and caused undue suffering, we continue to be irreparably harmed and on a daily basis face undue suffering by not only Defendants but also Defense counsel.”

“However, not only have the Defendants and Defense counsel caused us irreparable harm and undue suffering, disturbingly as this sounds, Defendants and Defense counsel have done the same to a very well-respected woman, The Honorable Judge Janet Berry.”

“It our belief that Judge Berry has been grossly insulted and mislead in her Court by not only Defendants, however, Defense counsel throughout the proceeding in this matter, during the discovery process, pretrial matters and throughout the course of the trial in this case.”

Bruce Johnson and Mark Mills are disgusted that Judge Berry had to be included in such deception on the part of Defendants and Defense counsel.

Furthermore, Johnson and Mills stated, “The reputation of the good lawyers out there has been harmed.”

Ryan W. Herrick and Clark V. Vellis, lawyers with the law firm of Jones and Vargus, 100 West Liberty Street, 12th Floor, Reno, Nevada 89504 represent the Defendants in this matter.

“The Defendants’ lawyers and respective firm deliberately withheld information pertinent to the outcome of the trial in this matter.”

“In doing so, the Defendants’ lawyers and respective firm breached their ethical obligations to The Honorable Judge Janet Berry, this Court, our attorney at the time, and the State of Nevada, the taxpayers, as well as, Cadarell Freeman and Michael Price and us.”

“We are tired of Defense counsel and Defendants continuous delay and gross tactics however; these tactics only encourage and compel us more to pursue justice.”

“We are fully dedicated and prepared in pursuing this matter until we prevail.” “We do so, out of the respect and memory of our friends and co-Plaintiffs, Cadarell Freeman and Michael Price, now deceased.” “It truly is beyond misfortune that our friends, Cadarell Freeman and Michael Price will never be able to confront the Defendants and Defense counsel.”