Posts Tagged ‘ Nestle ’

Bought any Candy Bars? Chocolate Candy Class Action Settlement Update

October 7th, 2011. By AbiK

Ever snag a chocolate bar as you’re checking out at the grocery store? Ever buy Halloween candy? Or, if you’re like me, maybe you keep a stash somewhere in the house. Just in case. For when you need that fix.

Well, you just might be part of a class action lawsuit settlement that you never knew you were part of. And funny how that word “fix” figures into this one. See, in the chocolate class action, the ‘fix’ is about alleged price fixing (which somehow sounds better with a French whirl: chocolat à prix fixe, doesn’t it?)

The Chocolate Class Action Lawsuit alleged that several chocolate makers—and we’re not talking high-end chocolatiers here—we’re talking the mass-marketed brands that every red-blooded American has bought at one time or other–conspired to “fix, raise, maintain or stablize prices of Chocolate Candy resulting in overcharges to those who purchased Chocolate Candy by a Defendant”. Yes, your basic anti-trust lawsuit.

If you’re tracking here, “a Defendant” implies there’s more than one defendant here. And there are. The defendants in the chocolate class action are: Cadbury Holdings Ltd., Cadbury pc, and Cadbury Adams Canada, Inc.; Hershey Canada, Inc., The Hershey Company, Mars, Inc., Mars Snackfood U.S., LLC and Nestle U.S.A., Inc.

Think of how much chocolate’s included there! Seriously…why there’s…

Hershey’s Milk Chocolate bars, Hershey’s Cookies ‘n Creme, Hershey’s Dark Chocolate, Hershey’s Milk Chocolate with Almonds, Hershey’s Miniatures, Mr. Goodbar, Symphony chocolate bars, Nestle Crunch, Butterfinger, Kit-Kat, M&M’s, Milky Way, Twix, Snickers, 3 Musketeers, Mars Bar, to name some favorites. Almost forgot—Cadbury Creme Eggs, too!

Ok, so now that you know who’s on the receiving end of this one, here are the details—as so far, Cadbury Holdings Ltd., Cadbury plc, and Cadbury Adams Canada, Inc. (“Cadbury”) have reached settlements—and the other defendants are still in litigation.

Are you part of the Chocolate Class Action Lawsuit?

There are actually two classes for this class action settlement. Because chocolate candy is sold at retailers and, therefore, the retailer—like Wal-Mart or Winn-Dixie—has had to purchase the chocolate wholesale directly from the manufacturer, there is a “Direct Purchasers” class. Direct purchase would mean anyone who bought the candy direct from the Defendant(s) and intended to resell it.

As you’ve probably guessed, the second class is for “Indirect Purchasers“; “Indirect Purchasers” meaning anyone who bought the chocolate in question from someone other than the Defendant(s) (e.g., a store) for the purpose of personal consumption–or to give as a gift.

You must have purchased the chocolate December 9, 2002 through December 20, 2007.

It is possible to be a member of both classes.

What does the Chocolate Class Action Settlement give me?

So far, only Cadbury has reached a settlement. The terms of the Cadbury settlement call for Cadbury to pay out $250,000 in cash to the Indirect Purchasers, and $1,312,500 in cash to the Direct Purchasers. The settlement also provides $250,000 to pay for notice of the settlements to all settlement classes. Cadbury also agreed to cooperate in the remaining litigation against the other Defendants.

What do I have to do to Submit a Claim for the Chocolate Class Action Settlement?

The Fairness Hearing is set for December 12, 2011. That’s when the final ok (or not) would be granted for the Cadbury settlement to go ahead. Once that happens, the claims administrator for the class action settlement would post a claim form that you would need to fill out and submit.

Right now, your best bet is to keep an eye on things, and you can do so at the Chocolate Candy Class Action Settlement websites–yes, there are two of them: One for Direct Purchasers, www.ChocolateSettlementDirect.com; and one for Indirect Purchasers, www.ChocolateSettlementIndirect.com. The Indirect one is the one you want if you just bought chocolate at a store for yourself or as a gift. (Do not submit claims to LawyersandSettlements.com for this.)

Also, if you’d like to be excluded from either class for the Cadbury settlement, the deadline is October 21, 2011. The deadline to object to the Cadbury settlement is November 28, 2011. Additionally, the deadline to submit a Notice of Intention toAppear at the Fairness Hearing is also November 28, 2011.

Tags: Cadbury, Chocolate Candy Class Action, Chocolate Price Fixing, Hershey, Mars, Nestle
Posted in Class Action, Emerging Issues, Settlement | 88478 Comments »2011-10-07+20%3A08%3A28AbiK

Nestle cheating babies again – Gerber babies, that is

February 25th, 2010. By janem

salt lick thing Nestle cheating babies again Gerber babies, that is Just about everyone knows that we have to watch our sodium intake. Recent studies report that most North Americans consume twice as much salt as they need and that leads to a host of health problems, such as kidney disease, stroke, heart disease and dementia. But what about baby? Most parents trust baby food like they trust their pediatrician, however, when it comes to Gerber products, baby beware.

According to the Canadian Stroke Network, a Gerber pasta meal—marketed for toddlers—contains the same amount of salt as two orders of McDonald’s fries. So the Stroke Network bestowed upon Gerber the “Salt Lick Award“, which is handed out annually to food items with extremely high levels of sodium. The Lil’ Entrees Chicken & Pasta Wheel Pick Ups meal contains 550 mg of salt—that’s more than half of the 1,000 mg of sodium a toddler needs to consume in one day.

In 2007 Gerber was sold to the Nestle Company for $5.5 billion. It makes more than 190 baby foods, sold in 80 countries. On its website, Gerber says it “doesn’t strain to make money. But it Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: Baby Food, Gerber, Nestle, Sodium
Posted in Emerging Issues | 2769No Comments »2010-02-25+17%3A27%3A11janem