Posts Tagged ‘ Iraq ’

Biz as Usual: Novo Nordisk Settles re NovoSeven, Seeks Brand Manager

June 14th, 2011. By AbiK

In case this one slipped under your radar, Danish drug company Novo Nordisk agreed to a settlement to the tune of $25 million to put to bed whistleblower allegations that it wrongly marketed its drug, NovoSeven (aka recombinant human coagulation Factor VIIa, or simply, Factor VII) as a treatment for traumatic bleeding due to injury.

Of course, outside of hemophiliacs—the obvious and intended audience for such a drug—who else could such a drug be marketed to? Well, gee, who might bleed a lot…let’s see…uh…well, there’s been a war going on over in Iraq and Afghanistan…maybe NovoSeven could be used to stop a soldier’s bleeding…whatdya think?

Sure, I’m being facetious here as I’m wont to do—but could such a scenario have really been all that far off—even if Novo Nordisk claims otherwise?

And ordinarily, this might have a shred of altruism to it—who wouldn’t want to help our soldiers? But here’s the catch: it seems that, according to The Baltimore Sun, NovoSeven was “a largely experimental drug” and it lacked FDA approval for combat wounds. According to the article, Novo Nordisk began promoting NovoSeven to military doctors way back in 2000, and by 2006, “Army protocol in Baghdad called for injecting it into virtually every casualty with signs of serious bleeding. Some Special Forces units in Afghanistan supplied combat medics with the drug, to inject in the field.”

Sounds like fairly extensive and routine use to me.

Add to this that studies have shown that off-label use of NovoSeven—which not only includes using it to treat combat wounds but also using NovoSeven for intracranial hemorrhage, cardiac surgery and aortic aneurysm, liver transplants and prostatectomy—has not translated to a reduction in mortality rates, and the use of NovoSeven for heart surgery and intracranial hemorrhage actually increased the risk of thromboembolism.

And this is how we want to treat our soldiers’ combat wounds?

I use the term “treat” a bit loosely—The Baltimore Sun had profiled three soldiers who’d been “treated” with NovoSeven in a series of articles written back in 2006. Sadly, two of those three soldiers later died as a result of complications related to blood clots. (Post script, the FDA has since added a warning to NovoSeven.)

Regardless, Novo Nordisk claims no wrongdoing (of course) in the NovoSeven settlement and, as business must keep on movin’ on, it appears Novo Nordisk is now seeking a new Senior Brand Manager for NovoSeven (see job posting above).

Tags: Afghanistan, Factor VII, Iraq, Novo Nordisk, NovoSeven, NovoSeven Lawsuit, NovoSeven Settlement, Soldiers, Veterans, Whistleblower
Posted in Drugs/Medical, Veterans, Whistleblower | 8054No Comments »2011-06-14+16%3A26%3A56AbiK

Burn Pits: VA Needs to Reflect Soldiers’ Commitment and Sacrifice

September 20th, 2010. By Hunter West

Signing up for military service—in other words, putting your life as you know it on hold for the benefit of your country—should not be met with questions, stonewalling, or delays from the US Department of Veterans Affairs (the VA) when you come back from some god-forsaken sector of the world half the man you used to be.

The VA should kiss the ground you walk on—that is, if you can even walk at all.

Tim Wymore can barely walk. He can do so only with a cane. He can barely stand. Of course, he can’t work. Worse, it seems he can’t look after himself, either. His wife has had to put her career on hold, and suffer the loss of her income (a loss felt by the entire family of five) in order to care for her husband.

Yes, Wymore gets VA disability benefits. But he doesn’t get the full measure of his due. That’s because, incredibly, the VA does not consider his disability permanent. In fact, the VA, according to an article at stltoday.com, thinks Wymore’s condition “may improve”. The obvious question is that if his condition “may” improve, then isn’t it reasonable to think it also “may not”?

So even though the man cannot work, can barely stand, can only walk with a cane and is 44 years old, the VA is withholding benefits that would ensure his family would be looked after once Wymore is gone.

For the Wymores, that sad day is not an ‘if’, but a ‘when.’ And they worry that the ‘when’ is Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: burn pit, burn pit lawsuit, Iraq, VA, Veterans, Veterans Benefits
Posted in Veterans | 5025No Comments »2010-09-20+14%3A38%3A00Hunter+West

US Troops: The Bomb was Real–maybe the Injury was, too

March 3rd, 2010. By AbiK

roadside bomb US Troops: The Bomb was Real maybe the Injury was, too Ever wonder what happens to soldiers who’ve been targeted in a roadside bombing in Iraq or Afghanistan?—and by that question I’m referring to those soldiers who live. Apparently not much happens unless there is an obvious injury. Or so one would be led to believe given the news today of a new medical policy coming from the Pentagon.

As reported at cnn.com, US troops who’ve been targeted in roadside bombings will now be pulled from duty for a 24-hour period to be monitored for headaches, memory or concentration loss, ringing ears and blurred vision—the signs of a concussion. If the soldier scores low for any of these symptoms he or she will be kept out of combat until their condition improves.

So why is this new medical policy—expected to be signed into effect within two to three weeks—happening now? Well, for one thing, a traumatic brain injury (TBI) that’s been sustained due to simply being near (definition of “near” is withing 55 yards of a blast according to the cnn.com article) a roadside bomb can go undetected only to surface months or years later. (Sound familiar to anyone with PTSD? or Gulf War Syndrome?)

If you think there aren’t too many soldiers affected by roadside bombs, think again. According to NATO’s International Security Assistance Force statistics, around 80 roadside bombs have exploded EACH WEEK in Afghanistan since June, 2009. Additionally, a 2008 RAND study indicated that as many as 300,000 US troops who’ve returned home from Iraq and Afghanistan could be suffering from traumatic brain injuries.

Pentagon officials estimate the number of troops that could be removed from duty under the new policy is about two percent.

Tags: Afghanistan, Brain Injury, Iraq, PTSD, TBI, Veterans
Posted in Drugs/Medical, Veterans | 2875No Comments »2010-03-03+17%3A26%3A25AbiK