<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LawyersandSettlements.com Legal Blog &#187; Intellectual Property</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/category/intellectual-property/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog</link>
	<description>America&#039;s Premier Online Legal News Source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:20:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Toothpaste Lawsuit over Blob Settles&#8230;so Who&#8217;s Got the Nurdle?</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/toothpaste-lawsuit-over-blob-settles-so-whos-got-the-nurdle-09017.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/toothpaste-lawsuit-over-blob-settles-so-whos-got-the-nurdle-09017.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 15:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AbiK</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colgate Palmolive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlaxoSmithKline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toothpaste Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toothpaste Nurdle Lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Triple Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Triple Protection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/?p=9017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Tootbrush1-150x150.png" class="attachment-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="Toothpaste Nurdle Lawsuit Settlement" title="Toothpaste Nurdle Lawsuit Settlement" />Toothpaste blob lawsuit settlement - the dramatic courtroom battle over toothpaste nurdle rights has reached its incredible denouement. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/toothpaste-lawsuit-over-blob-settles-so-whos-got-the-nurdle-09017.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Kim Kardashian have a Case v. Old Navy? You be the Judge</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/does-kim-kardashian-have-a-case-v-old-navy-you-be-the-judge-08912.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/does-kim-kardashian-have-a-case-v-old-navy-you-be-the-judge-08912.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AbiK</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emerging Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kardashian lookalike lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kim Kardashian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louis Petrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Gap]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/?p=8912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The lookalike lawsuit filed by Kim Kardashian against Old Navy (owned by The Gap, Inc.) has not just faded away like rinse on your fave Old Navy Skinny Mini-Flare jeans—Color: Cottonwood, that is. Nope. Now The Gap is bringing in the big guns by hiring attorney Louis Petrich of Leopold, Petrich &#038; Smith.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/does-kim-kardashian-have-a-case-v-old-navy-you-be-the-judge-08912.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five Dollars says Footlong not Subway Trademark Infringement</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/five-dollars-says-footlong-not-subway-trademark-infringement-06884.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/five-dollars-says-footlong-not-subway-trademark-infringement-06884.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 19:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AbiK</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Casey's General Stores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Five Dollar Footlong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Footlong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valerie Pochron]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/?p=6884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any any any&#8230;FIVE&#8230;five dollar&#8230;five dollar footlong&#8230;any any any&#8230; Ok, if you sat transfixed in front of the tube during the last Olympic games, you could not have possibly missed the Subway jingle touting their five-dollar footlong sandwich. For that matter, if you&#8217;ve EVER sat in front of a television, you&#8217;ve probably needed some form of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/five-dollars-says-footlong-not-subway-trademark-infringement-06884.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Made a Hero out of Adam Guerbuez</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/facebook-made-a-hero-out-of-adam-guerbuez-05174.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/facebook-made-a-hero-out-of-adam-guerbuez-05174.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 18:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hunter West</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet/E-commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Guerbuez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Million Dollar Man]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/?p=5174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, we&#8217;ve all heard about him by now. &#8220;The 873 Million Dollar Man,&#8221; otherwise known as Adam Guerbuez, the Montreal computer whiz and self-confessed internet marketer who was found to have sent millions of unwanted and uninvited solicitations to Facebook users for everything from erectile dysfunction and penis enlargements to marijuana products.  Facebook took him [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/facebook-made-a-hero-out-of-adam-guerbuez-05174.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Damn IHOP &#8211; Went for Pancakes and They&#8217;re Fasting!</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/damn-ihop-went-for-pancakes-and-theyre-fasting-04979.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/damn-ihop-went-for-pancakes-and-theyre-fasting-04979.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AbiK</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IHOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IHOP-KC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Infringement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/?p=4979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let me explain. First off, this IHOP is actually IHOP-KC—which stands for International House of Prayer - Kansas City. And well, it seems that the other IHOP—the one you all know that serves up pancakes with a portfolio of syrups on each table (and the never empty coffee pot™)—is a bit miffed that the Prayer IHOP is using its well-established acronym. So miffed that they've filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against the religious organization. They want IHOP-KC to stop using the IHOP acronym.

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/damn-ihop-went-for-pancakes-and-theyre-fasting-04979.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Happens to Your Image After the Airport Scan?</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/what-happens-to-your-image-after-the-airport-scan-04640.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/what-happens-to-your-image-after-the-airport-scan-04640.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hunter West</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Airlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airport Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/?p=4640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A group known as the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), working through a Freedom of Information Act request, obtained what was described as a &#8220;representative sample&#8221; of more than 35,000 &#8216;whole body images&#8217; of attendees at a US courthouse in Orlando.  The images are captured by millimeter wave technology and are ghost-like, not showing much [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/what-happens-to-your-image-after-the-airport-scan-04640.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hey, Leave my Nurdle Alone! (Glaxo &amp; Colgate go at it&#8230;)</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/hey-leave-my-nurdle-alone-glaxo-colgate-go-at-it-04574.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/hey-leave-my-nurdle-alone-glaxo-colgate-go-at-it-04574.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AbiK</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glaxo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nurdle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toothpaste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/?p=4574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The beauty of blogging about all things legal is that you just never know what you&#8217;ll come across. Many times there are heart-wrenching personal injury stories. Sometimes there are lawsuits that need to be filed under &#8220;ridiculous&#8220;. And then, there&#8217;s the nurdle. For those of you not-in-the-know, a &#8220;nurdle&#8221; would be the dollop or blob [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/hey-leave-my-nurdle-alone-glaxo-colgate-go-at-it-04574.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge This: Has Hulk Hogan got a case vs. Cocoa Pebbles?</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/judge-this-has-hulk-hogan-got-a-case-vs-cocoa-pebbles-03701.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/judge-this-has-hulk-hogan-got-a-case-vs-cocoa-pebbles-03701.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 14:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AbiK</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cocoa Pebbles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hulk Hogan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post Cereal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wrestling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/?p=3701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the Hulk (as in Hogan, not as in Incredible) is suing cereal maker Post over their use of a wrestler, Hulk Boulder, in an ad for Cocoa Pebbles. Hulk Boulder, admittedly, does seem to bear a bit of a likeness to the Hulk Hogan we knew circa 1990—that would be approximately the last year in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/judge-this-has-hulk-hogan-got-a-case-vs-cocoa-pebbles-03701.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Target &amp; Coach Bags Separated at Birth? (perish the thought)</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/target-coach-bags-separated-at-birth-perish-the-thought-03662.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/target-coach-bags-separated-at-birth-perish-the-thought-03662.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 13:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AbiK</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Emerging Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[handbags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LF USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Li & Fung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Target]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/?p=3662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now I ask you, do these bags look the same? Do they resemble each other? Ok, maybe to both questions—particularly if you&#8217;re not in the market for such. But to those who shop handbags, these two bags are as far apart as Melanie Griffith and a natural look. Never mind that. Coach took Target to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/target-coach-bags-separated-at-birth-perish-the-thought-03662.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yes, I&#8217;m defending Paris Hilton</title>
		<link>http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/yes-im-defending-paris-hilton-02397.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/yes-im-defending-paris-hilton-02397.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AbiK</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paris Hilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Infringement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/?p=2397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ll say it again: Yes, I&#8217;m defending Paris Hilton. Paris has been slapped with an infringement lawsuit over her Paris Hilton shoes&#8217; insole cushion. They&#8217;re heart-shaped. And wouldn&#8217;t you know, Gwyneth Shoes has very similar insoles—so similar, in fact, that they claim Paris stole the idea! Now, admittedly, I don&#8217;t have the inside scoop on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/blog/yes-im-defending-paris-hilton-02397.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

