Reglan Users Allege They Were Not Properly Warned of Risks

Patients who suffer from Reglan neurological side effects, such as tardive dyskinesia, may be shocked to learn they took Reglan for far longer than they should have. The drug, used to treat acid reflux and heartburn, is meant to be taken for only three months. Reglan has potentially irreversible side effects that often show up after the patient has used the drug on a long-term basis.

Reglan lawsuits are now being filed by patients who say they were never warned about the risks of tardive dyskinesia or long-term use. Some patients say they took the drug for years.

Reglan Users Allege They Were Not Properly Warned of Risks

In 2008, a patient named Shirley Brinkley filed a lawsuit against Wyeth, the maker of Reglan. Brinkley alleges that she was first prescribed Reglan in June, 1992 to treat motility of her stomach, and continued taking the medication until April, 2007.

According to Brinkley's lawsuit, her doctors relied on information published in the package inserts and the Physician's Desk Reference and were not aware that the information given could have been inaccurate or misleading.

Brinkley has been diagnosed with permanent and disabling neurological injury, including tardive dyskinesia. Her lawsuit alleges that the makers of Reglan failed to warn her and her physicians of the risks associated with Reglan, including the risk of unsafe doses. She further alleges that the defendants committed fraud by misrepresenting Reglan's adverse effects.

Brinkley's lawsuit seeks in excess of $600,000 in damages.

Other lawsuits have now also been filed against the makers of Reglan, alleging failure to adequately warn the public about the risks associated with the use of Reglan. Some of these lawsuits were filed by parents of children who were prescribed Reglan as infants and now suffer from movement disorders as a result.

Reglan Users Allege They Were Not Properly Warned of Risks

Reglan Legal Help

ADD YOUR COMMENT ON THIS STORY